Progress Report: Authority Plan 2023-28
PDNPA (opens new window)
PDNPA (opens new window)
  • Introduction
  • Executive summary
  • Enabling Delivery Aim

  • Performance & Business Plans

  • Year 23-24

    • Foreword by Chair of the Authority
    • Corporate Risk Register 23/24
    • Equality Duty Key Performance Indicators
    • Financial overview and statements
    • Staff posts
    • Corporate Risk Register 24/25
  • Year 24-25

  • References

  • Authority Plan 2023-2028
  • National Park Management Plan 2023-2028
  • National Park Management Plan Progress Report 23-28

Performance & Business Plan: 2023 - 24

Corporate Risk Register 24/25

This is a statement of the proposed Corporate Risk Register (24/25) following the look forward assessment associated with the delivery of the Authority Plan and National Park Managment Plan and our external environment.

Overall risk level Risk factor Likelihood Impact
Aim 1:  Influencing ELMs/Area of NP land safeguarded (ref: 20/21B updated start of year 24/25) High High
Aim 2: Risk to nature recovery delivery in the white peak (ref: 24/25H) High High
Obj A: Planning enforcement backlogs (ref: 23/24J) High Medium
Obj D/E: UK Government department and agencies capacity to support Protected Landscape purposes (ref: 24/25E) High Medium
Obj G: LURA “Duty to seek to further” risk to partnership working and NPMP delivery (ref: 24/25F) High Medium
Aim 2: ELMs Test and Trial outcomes (ref: 24/25I) High Medium
Aim 3: Rights of Way deterioration and reduction in funding (ref: 24/25L) Medium Medium
Aim 3:  People management in the National Park (ref: 24/25M) High Medium
Aim 4: Local Plan review delay (ref: 23/24G) High Medium
Obj A: DLUHC Revision of planning performance standards (ref: 24/25A) Medium High
Obj D: DEFRA grant agreement and funding (ref: 24/25C) (see also 24/25D) Medium High
Obj D: DEFRA Targets and Outcomes Framework based performance monitoring (ref: 24/25D) Medium High
Obj G: NPMP and Authority Action Plan delivery risks (ref: 23/24B) Medium High
Obj G: Core IT systems maintenance and development (ref: 23/24K) Medium High
Aim 1: Failure to complete the plan to achieve Nature Recovery (ref: 20/21D updated start of year 24/25) Medium High
Aim 2: Moorland Management Group (ref: 23/24I) Medium High
Aim 2: National scale new infrastructure Impact (ref: 24/25M) Medium High
Aim 3: (Putative) New Rights of Way/Open Access legislation (ref: 24/25O) Medium High
Obj C/D: Extended absence of an HoS or senior officer (accepted permanent generic risk) Medium Medium
Obj D: Failure of large scale bids (ref: 24/25 G) Medium Medium
Obj E: Injury/Loss of life & property damage due to unsafe trees (ref: 22/23E updated start of year 24/25) Medium Medium
Obj E/H: Asset Management capacity (ref: 23/24E) Medium Medium
Aim 2: Private finance for landscape and nature recovery (ref: 24/25N) Medium Medium
Aim 3: Active Travel England Project delivery & development risk (ref: 24/25J) Medium Medium
Aim 4: East Midlands Combined Councils Authority priorities (ref: 24/25K potential impact on all NPMP Aims) Medium Medium
Obj G: Reputational risks (ref: 24/25 B) Low Low

Our 2024/25 Corporate Risk Register has been developed through an assessment of the risks to achieving Year 2 of our 23-28 Authority Plan and National Park Management Plan.

This included reviewing

  • 23/24 corporate risks remaining at amber or red at the 23/24 year end
  • Risks to be escalated from service risk registers
  • Our external environment

Risk Key: Obj [ ] = Objective risk (Authority Plan) , Aim [ ] = Aim risk (NPMP Plan)

← Staff posts Foreword by Chair of the Authority →